It’s not surprising that amid all the fears of energy inflation, driven in part by the government’s introduction of the carbon price floor last April, 60% of UK businesses are looking hard at ways to improve their energy efficiency this year. And 88% say they are worried about the security of their energy supply.
These statistics appear in a recent report from the Major Energy Users’ Council (Powercut Britain: Are The Lights About To Go Out For UK Business? October 2013).
The report focuses more on cost savings than on improving environmental sustainability, but the two are of course linked. Of all the options available to businesses, including investing in behavioural change programmes and on-site generation, upgrading to greener lighting systems might seem the quickest fix – and might also promise the best return on investment. After all, lighting accounts for on average a third of a building’s electricity use (a figure which hasn’t changed in a quarter of a decade, since the 1997 Kyoto Protocol), compared to 28% for heating.
Let’s say you’ve decided on an upgrade, for cost-saving and/or environmental reasons, and you’ve chosen an energy-efficient lighting technology. So far, so good. You’ve also locked down a specific lighting design for your building(s), which includes lamps, fixtures and controls, as well as choices concerning adjusting colour and intensity. Even better. You might at this stage think you’re well on the way to saving up to 40% of your lighting energy costs, according to The Carbon Trust. But you might be mistaken, because you might not have given enough thought to how you are going to pay for it all. It’s easy to blow a significant amount of those potential cost savings on an inefficient financing model.
Take, for example, leasing: a popular tax-efficient option for most capital assets – but possibly not the best option when upgrading to greener lighting systems. This is because if you lease, you can’t take advantage of the government’s Enhanced Capital Allowance (ECA) scheme, which allows a business to offset 100% of the cost of investments in certain energy-saving equipment against any taxable first-year profits. Clearly any savings will benefit only the end user – and ultimate owner of the technology system – not the lessor.
This doesn’t mean you have to incur major upfront capital costs. Instead, consider the good old-fashioned Hire Purchase agreement, which lets you spread instalments while guaranteeing final ownership of the asset.
Final ownership of the asset is not the only technicality to be considered. The lighting products must also meet the Government’s ECA eligibility criteria. While these are published online, it is worth confirming with the manufacturer, as guidelines are not crystal clear, given that products are not listed individually.
So if you are one of the 60% of UK businesses planning a substantial investment this year (MEUC, October 2014), Hire Purchase might not seem the obvious choice. However, it’s a pragmatic solution that offers a triple whammy: